ProutWorld  News  Features  Ideology  Sarkar  FAQ  Prout in 60 minutes  Bookshop

 
Analysis & Synthesis page

Current   Cooperatives   Activist   Women   Global   Food   Resources

Background on this assessment

Assessment of the Copenhagen
Alternative Declaration (CAD)

Issued by the Proutist Universal Global Office

We observe with deep concern that despite years of commitment to equality and peace, disparities are widening between rich and poor and between nations, while simultaneously there occurs a deepening of religious and cultural ideologies and identities due to growing religious fundamentalism and growing tension between ethnic groups. Contradiction and inequality continue to exist between men and women, privileged and unprivileged. Conflicts have increased over diminishing resources and opportunities, and for the consolidation of power by political-economic oligarchies.

The Copenhagen Alternative Declaration (CAD) tried to focus on the structural ca uses of poverty, unemployment, social disintegration and environmental degradation, which the World Summit on Social Development (WSSD) failed to address.

It is important to mention here that the "open free market" and "neo-liberal system of economy" mentioned in the CAD are not isolated phenomena. This economic system is supported and promoted by a political system. There is constant effort by powerful nations to impose monopoly economic control under the pretext of liberal democracy and its corollary the free market economy. This directly contradicts the well being of indigenous culture and misappropriates natural resources. Under the apparatus of the liberal democratic structure itself we have become cogs in a bureaucratic machine, with our thoughts, feelings and tastes manipulated by government, industry and the mass communications they control. The consequence is degeneration of human values.

Besides economic and political causes, social and cultural structures also promote injustice and gender inequity. This was mentioned in the declaration, but in sufficiently analysed. In so-called liberal democratic society, a materialistic monoculture is encouraged to create individualism and a consumer psychology, which cause alienation. Family relations weaken as a result. The social structure is not strong enough to counter the nexus between the political and economic structures that engenders this monoculture. Fundamentalist society, on the other hand , though promoting strong social bonds and family relations, dramatically curtails the freedom of women.

Hence it is not only a "question of innovating and devising local answers to community needs", but also a question of reforming the social structure and encouraging cultural synthesis based on spiritual values that strengthen the bonds of unity amidst the plethora of diversities.

We support the statement that "social development can only be achieved if all human rights—civil, political, economic and cultural—of all individuals and people be fulfilled". But as we know, there is a strong connection between political and economic oligarchies that impedes the realisation of many rights. In some countries, religious institutions impose injustice and curtail human rights even further. Hence, without changing the structural causes of injustice and the violation of human rights it is questionable whether it is possible to eradicate injustice.

Our comments and proposals about specific sections of the declaration follow:

At the household level

Some of these demands were made without fully appreciating diversified circumstances that exist in various parts of the world. Thus we propose a few amendments.

  • In India and China, for example, many women prefer abortion when through prenatal tests they come to know that the fetus is a girl. This causes an imbalance i n the ratios between men and women. So we propose that reproductive choice be a community rather than an individual matter.

  • Instead of the wording "Children’s rights should be respected and enhanced", w e would like to propose "The security, welfare and all-round progress of all children should be guaranteed".

  • Child labour should be abolished and all children engaged in it should be rehabilitated and given the opportunity to gain education and training.

  • Child prostitution and child marriage should be banned.

  • In many places it is essential to change social attitudes and value systems so that children do not suffer emotionally due to frequent or impulsive and easy family breakups. To counter this trend, factors encouraging unity and dissolving antagonism should be targeted and upheld.

  • Polygamy should in general be banned.

At the community level

To materialise the community goals proposed in the declaration will call for basic changes in the economic structure, from centralised control and a free market economy to a decentralised economy and economic democracy, where natural resources and the means of production are socially controlled instead of government or privately controlled.

In this line we suggest that a special banking system be introduced in villages to provide capital to the poorest sections of society as part of an effort to guarantee the minimum requirements for living. In India and Bangladesh, for example, some banks have taken the initiative to provide training and loans to village people and are meeting with success.

NGOs have tremendous scope throughout the world to work on this level without de pending on government structures, provided we can work in a coordinated way. We can select communities (especially villages) in different countries and form planning bodies with local people to create model communities with a view to economic self-reliance as well as educational, cultural and quality of life considerations.

At the national level

Nationalism based on geo-sentiment (geo-religion, geo-politics, geo-economics) or socio-sentiment (Islamism, Zionism, etc.) is the sentimental climate of today. In this environment minorities are bound to suffer, and in many fundamentalist societies women’s freedom and economic independence are not supported. Hence we propose:

  • All laws, customs and systems that discriminate against minorities and women should be abolished.

  • Growth-led economic policies should be transformed into human development policies, keeping people, especially women, at the centre of such policies.

  • The economic independence of women should be accepted as one of the major goal s of economic development.

  • Laws should be enacted, where they do not exist, to give property rights to women.

  • Measures should be taken to reorient the education system and utilising the mass media to promote the values of universalism and spiritual humanism, and to counter the effects of consumer psychology and pseudo-culture.

  • Fundamental security for all that includes food, clothes, housing, education and medical care should be guaranteed by ensuring sufficient purchasing capacity through reformulating economic policy for full employment.

  • Seed banks should be created if they do not exist to develop local species of crops and plants.

  • The ecosystem, herbs and medicinal plants should be preserved.

A question that remains paramount is whether governments and economic oligarchies, which support the existing structures and value systems will allow reforms that threaten their power base, whether economic, political or religious.

At the international level

At the international level we observe with apprehension that the U.N. and other international forums have failed

  • To stop genocide in Tibet, Burma, Bosnia, Nigeria, Somalia, Rwanda and many other places;

  • To eradicate injustice towards minorities in most parts of the world;

  • To stop monopoly economic control imposed by Bretton Woods institutions in collaboration with TNCs and national ruling classes, with total disregard for the opinions of millions;

  • To take any concrete steps to usher in a just economic order;

  • To impose on nations the abolition of all laws and customs that discriminate against women;

  • To address the structural causes of conflict and disunity.

Here we propose the following additions to the CAD:
In the second clause, cultural diversity has been stressed while unity is ignored. Cultural diversity cannot be "the principle source of new strength" unless we strengthen unity through cultural and social synthesis and accept the organic wholeness of the universe and the spiritual interrelatedness of all created beings. Basic cultural and social contradictions are causing enormous conflict between races, social groups and religions. Unity in diversity should be our basic value. Globalisation in this sense will mean accepting that human society is one and indivisible.

  • The free expression of all languages and cultures should be ensured.

  • The patenting of technology and genetic resources by TNCs and other international agencies must be prohibited.

We have to think seriously how to transform the functioning of the U.N., which i s now almost powerless to interfere against government violations of human right s unless this interference is supported by powerful nations. Hence we propose ad opting common universal values based on spiritual humanism to strengthen unity beyond race, religion, tribe, nation or gender as the basis of a global as well a s national constitutions. A proper constitution will safeguard the securities of minorities, abolish all unjust laws and systems that suppress the free expression of language and culture and cause environmental devastation, and guarantee the minimum requirements of life to all.

We would like to emphasise that the political and economic sectors are well organised, whereas social organisations and civic bodies are scattered and relatively unorganised. We propose therefore the cooperative organisation of the social sector on all levels as the primary means of strengthening the structural base of people’s power.

We believe that though people around the world are motivated by diverse views an d sentiments, the urge for unity can bring us to work together towards common goals.

Copyright Proutist Universal 1999-2005